{"id":"W2006950412","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00444.x","title":"Humpback whale abundance in the North Pacific estimated by photographic capture‐recapture with bias correction from simulation studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Mammal Science","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Mark and recapture; Humpback whale; Population; Sampling (signal processing); Abundance estimation; Sampling bias; Right whale; Statistics; Geography; Whale; Biology; Fishery; Demography; Sample size determination; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006394935,0.0002814298,0.0002522713,0.00006536879,0.0004770205,0.00008789179,0.0007450188,0.00004557017,0.0008670409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000171566,0.0001772041,0.00004266397,0.002430188,0.001249192,0.0005824646,0.000668344,0.0002659341,0.0001099013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001942821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001708106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04332979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09780852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975868,0.00009568185,0.0002894782,0.0007242673,0.0007909189,0.0005127811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991009,0.0001619371,0.0001814617,0.0004207814,0.00004795623,0.00008698295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007257246,0.0001223219,0.9807583,0.000005536709,0.00001040677,0.00001661956,0.002854188,0.001437783,0.0001337162,0.000007076515,0.0008711626,0.01371032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002523001,0.000181239,0.9871742,0.00002451252,0.00002096013,0.000006917027,0.001279994,0.008223184,0.0002100697,0.0001245521,0.002229341,0.0002727198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722759,0.0001689695,0.0001119824,0.00008923922,0.0002000985,0.000476068,0.00000760067,0.00006329644,0.02660683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983757,0.0001507936,0.0007299431,0.0002785601,0.00002326423,0.00005578866,0.00001176529,0.0000132457,0.0003608978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05447873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04899029959173596,"score_gpt":0.2549834310821448,"score_spread":0.2059931314904089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}