{"id":"W2006950412","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00444.x","title":"Humpback whale abundance in the North Pacific estimated by photographic capture‐recapture with bias correction from simulation studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Mammal Science","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Mark and recapture; Humpback whale; Population; Sampling (signal processing); Abundance estimation; Sampling bias; Right whale; Statistics; Geography; Whale; Biology; Fishery; Demography; Sample size determination; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003135687,0.0002983817,0.0003728632,0.0006910609,0.0002793318,0.0005962017,0.0005593282,0.0004357246,0.0008427315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01289216,0.0003763305,0.0008051398,0.0004874674,0.0002627824,0.0005946959,0.0003069302,0.0003016516,0.0001231294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009842709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005971302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06454706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04985857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992316,0.0005057264,0.00004099156,0.0001010465,0.0000817187,0.00003892311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942874,0.003823543,0.0008055959,0.0005260777,0.0004675339,0.00008987667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001286122,0.00005508153,0.3131482,0.00009453805,0.0004252555,0.0001822308,0.00008570403,0.6720889,0.0004287834,0.0006964087,0.0003886175,0.01227763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005035484,0.000109437,0.1372093,0.00006313244,0.0001745327,0.0001343771,0.00008471338,0.8602282,0.0005261085,0.0008816231,0.0005109034,0.00002721813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991415,0.0001748017,0.007091443,0.00008065812,0.00000635334,0.00002469385,0.0002729043,0.00003802256,0.0008960723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964031,0.0000827295,0.003005114,0.00001754357,0.000003105027,0.00002460294,0.0002983694,0.000004115785,0.0001613155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06454706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1283427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04899029959173596,"score_gpt":0.2549834310821448,"score_spread":0.2059931314904089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}