{"id":"W2007057754","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.002","title":"Cost to produce Carbon credits by reducing the harvest level in British Columbia, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hectare; Carbon credit; Revenue; Opportunity cost; Total cost; Agricultural economics; Carbon fibers; Carbon sequestration; Cost estimate; Environmental science; Agricultural science; Business; Economics; Finance; Mathematics; Geography; Greenhouse gas; Agriculture; Ecology; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002390109,0.00008706865,0.0001226124,0.00002032841,0.0001497018,0.0002380459,0.0002465089,0.00003608737,0.00009348778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001142392,0.0001165404,0.00001402682,0.0001271065,0.0001002596,0.0001297263,0.0002100733,0.00008712643,0.0000387888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002945613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005970459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990843,0.00002376768,0.0001848913,0.0002798851,0.00005598008,0.0003711689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995353,0.00004292344,0.00005142252,0.0002308359,0.000002136592,0.0001373347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004958944,0.00002293759,0.6177182,0.00001228113,0.000007205919,0.000001635146,0.0003500129,0.007572612,0.00001094093,0.0005686923,0.3569163,0.0168142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001766399,0.00002546274,0.524178,0.00001003626,0.000003055969,0.000004979228,0.00001905924,0.003437823,0.000007992815,0.0003454057,0.4716314,0.0001602028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750699,0.000008506707,0.000001617038,0.002699569,0.0001337015,0.0003088419,0.00005981433,0.000008486821,0.02170956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805106,0.00003132826,0.00003207791,0.002360571,0.0003035523,0.00003752164,0.00001502178,0.00001514327,0.01669418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1147151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4752378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01346834881162109,"score_gpt":0.1993964798512966,"score_spread":0.1859281310396755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}