{"id":"W2007071308","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2015.01.008","title":"Matching markets under (in)complete information","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Creative Europe; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Complete information; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian game; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Preference; Mechanism (biology); Incomplete markets; Bayesian probability; Economics; Equilibrium selection; Computer science; Best response; Microeconomics; Repeated game; Game theory; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007629653,0.0005641102,0.003799389,0.001204193,0.001284275,0.006392902,0.00303812,0.005330577,0.01180103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04937045,0.001019588,0.001117232,0.00158484,0.003075564,0.01213813,0.003024635,0.002284311,0.001022475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001742332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002319008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001952334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001341493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947621,0.002235409,0.0003582164,0.0007984622,0.0007873501,0.001058397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680489,0.01877575,0.006027228,0.003221855,0.002186656,0.00173973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002704701,0.0001432504,0.0009629118,0.0001086897,0.00005626358,0.0001919423,0.0001912554,0.0301533,0.0005937931,0.9562212,0.00263197,0.008474872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001254017,0.00004596954,0.0003136987,0.00001307603,0.00001817336,0.00006451899,0.00005524052,0.09833682,0.000199365,0.9002014,0.0006054052,0.0000209516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235658,0.0007047353,0.4204456,0.00756993,0.0002106285,0.0002899747,0.001347847,0.0004327336,0.04543262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699754,0.000362558,0.01755489,0.0004493721,0.0003321761,0.0001314862,0.0003194144,0.00004412972,0.01083049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01180103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0403499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05079132092441328,"score_gpt":0.233542820059775,"score_spread":0.1827514991353617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}