{"id":"W2007098848","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.039","title":"Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to Protected Areas management: The case of Corbett National Park, India","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"The Corbett Foundation","keywords":"Stakeholder; Stakeholder analysis; National park; Business; Environmental resource management; Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder management; Stakeholder engagement; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Geography; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001052137,0.00008736594,0.0001175226,0.00005849458,0.0002757654,0.00003545111,0.0002660528,0.00006327577,0.0009000077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002238903,0.0000466534,0.00007446235,0.0009897901,0.0003695362,0.00007480125,0.0002597899,0.00010852,0.00001005987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002222538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008513311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009339876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006124108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989837,0.0001791246,0.0002555823,0.0002165911,0.0002494491,0.0001155527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992415,0.0002083032,0.0001984177,0.0002476106,0.00007190055,0.00003227508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001895907,0.00007801414,0.9931313,0.000007158017,0.0001103389,0.000005702347,0.0001861639,0.00006276681,0.001923364,0.0002548366,0.0004438601,0.003777573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107196,0.00002077039,0.9932411,0.00000224682,0.00009514573,0.00000263109,0.0006295108,0.002320783,0.000191553,0.0003265112,0.002999797,0.00006269433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933668,0.000003321076,0.0008008584,0.001842526,0.0000362498,0.0005854252,0.00002191818,0.00001511201,0.003327756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984645,0.000001847339,0.0007120492,0.0006816922,0.00001039124,0.00002521828,0.00002689297,0.000001627599,0.00007577686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005097671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08740437431936181,"score_gpt":0.2804991085633017,"score_spread":0.1930947342439399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}