{"id":"W2007135105","doi":"10.1002/jae.624","title":"Rethinking an old empirical puzzle: econometric evidence on the forward discount anomaly","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Regression; Forward rate; Series (stratigraphy); Parametric statistics; Anomaly (physics); Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Regression toward the mean; Statistics; Interest rate; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00567418,0.0003679756,0.001007419,0.002704371,0.0004209608,0.0004114472,0.001213104,0.0002686716,0.0005355837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001669322,0.0003145503,0.0004223936,0.003240514,0.0001174816,0.00115502,0.0001295903,0.0009706612,0.0003467117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006276309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000948453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005527493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002875177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962128,0.00003526397,0.002280009,0.0006471552,0.0001934441,0.0006312891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954967,0.001195478,0.002016469,0.0008336607,0.0001466474,0.0003109891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009380784,0.001079645,0.3873136,0.00008241735,0.0003275553,0.00005554118,0.004602726,0.0154436,0.0000162177,0.5618831,0.003033289,0.02522422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002501365,0.002350332,0.2248729,0.0002041796,0.0001200437,0.0001400125,0.001146958,0.05881366,0.0002166552,0.5859028,0.1217508,0.001980367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652939,0.002356611,0.0100475,0.00232118,0.0008195582,0.0003261165,0.00003384803,0.00002759175,0.01877366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932423,0.002656691,0.001639035,0.001475964,0.0007414666,0.00001564891,0.000003576996,0.00005579919,0.0001695681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1624408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1918972952420216,"score_gpt":0.2915808870280462,"score_spread":0.0996835917860246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}