{"id":"W2007135105","doi":"10.1002/jae.624","title":"Rethinking an old empirical puzzle: econometric evidence on the forward discount anomaly","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Regression; Forward rate; Series (stratigraphy); Parametric statistics; Anomaly (physics); Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Regression toward the mean; Statistics; Interest rate; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008181806,0.000236782,0.0007198266,0.001868926,0.0003092044,0.002515175,0.00112264,0.001306526,0.004220419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07208308,0.000217621,0.0003489797,0.001862176,0.003123879,0.003915649,0.001702029,0.002290193,0.0004144402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006396893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005400165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002079741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001130407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999067,0.0004113359,0.00007846672,0.0001164308,0.0002845251,0.00004227823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8953234,0.08489572,0.009488423,0.006236353,0.003588869,0.0004673464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005000685,0.0002346185,0.1117375,0.0004737871,0.000256318,0.001279635,0.001940407,0.02104998,0.002614918,0.6808902,0.009038597,0.1699839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001358237,0.00009545689,0.08536141,0.0003264119,0.0002268666,0.0005059153,0.001777258,0.08752876,0.002338197,0.8060224,0.01555541,0.0001261868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244717,0.01165356,0.08802838,0.05260117,0.0004263096,0.00002153151,0.0004991808,0.0002933745,0.02200492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990822,0.003145837,0.003498357,0.0007342368,0.0005531944,0.000003891666,0.00009515689,0.00002916388,0.001118131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008181806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04327005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1918972952420216,"score_gpt":0.2915808870280462,"score_spread":0.0996835917860246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}