{"id":"W2007186883","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.005","title":"Rates and determinants of informed consent: A case study of an international thromboprophylaxis trial","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Critical Care","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Queen's University; Vancouver General Hospital; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Medicine; Confidence interval; Odds ratio; Randomized controlled trial; Intensive care; Family medicine; Clinical trial; Intensive care medicine; Surgery; Internal medicine; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03390618,0.0002518213,0.0006936394,0.0009282752,0.00228769,0.002611708,0.001290032,0.002903983,0.003071834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.151129,0.000464959,0.0006024336,0.001402024,0.002933106,0.002316371,0.001662781,0.003313262,0.0002814608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001302437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001658916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003140146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002372938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9649464,0.0288571,0.00167633,0.001021917,0.00178411,0.00171417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7721906,0.1858534,0.02540412,0.009362241,0.003951452,0.003238131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005631162,0.002550001,0.9153063,0.0002065846,0.0003474142,0.01014469,0.02257511,0.0007250787,0.0006957799,0.01701212,0.001472162,0.02333364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001282712,0.007102345,0.8048915,0.001011161,0.00128393,0.07371163,0.05268027,0.02212689,0.00349411,0.02395891,0.008034346,0.0004222839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954203,0.0004227424,0.0005404671,0.00106834,0.000007683766,0.00007167055,0.00004417377,0.000002223489,0.002422414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993549,0.000128786,0.0002844826,0.00008279554,0.000009239518,0.00003237731,0.00001677294,0.000003051517,0.00008759768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.997096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1793151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5121035727134645,"score_gpt":0.6535620793932521,"score_spread":0.1414585066797875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}