{"id":"W2007190081","doi":"10.1111/jvs.12006","title":"Temporal changes in abundance–occupancy relationships within and between communities after disturbance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Occupancy; Relative species abundance; Grassland; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Plant community; Ecological succession; Relative abundance distribution; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002283922,0.00007550597,0.00013974,0.0001442405,0.0002892114,0.00003053642,0.0001709667,0.00003733473,0.00002251074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001871083,0.00006253972,0.00001648312,0.0004320499,0.0008752955,0.001366773,0.00008372754,0.000266718,0.00001415034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001104487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002289389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002326059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990156,0.0001130193,0.0003056744,0.00007631881,0.0002973829,0.0001919605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992537,0.0002176523,0.000317781,0.00008384034,0.00004130105,0.00008576477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008237449,0.00002245974,0.9870375,0.000005991215,0.000002570767,9.045892e-7,0.01195845,0.0002293265,0.0001080036,0.0002795893,0.000006150657,0.0003408377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001660291,0.00004713525,0.9966058,0.00003887013,0.000008175753,0.00001245583,0.001139021,0.0004265994,0.00008961847,0.001330667,0.00006300421,0.00007259281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974376,0.0005565194,0.0006170232,0.000467327,0.0001992903,0.00006138169,8.661301e-7,0.000004134602,0.0006558771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962932,0.00004682866,0.003448974,0.0001043413,0.00004463787,0.000005893595,4.387114e-7,0.000003268783,0.00005235531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01081943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3225062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0365365754617851,"score_gpt":0.2833219829149059,"score_spread":0.2467854074531208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}