{"id":"W2007190081","doi":"10.1111/jvs.12006","title":"Temporal changes in abundance–occupancy relationships within and between communities after disturbance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Occupancy; Relative species abundance; Grassland; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Plant community; Ecological succession; Relative abundance distribution; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006570379,0.00008141414,0.0002878593,0.0009750518,0.0004475212,0.0007128905,0.0002977262,0.0003007293,0.001436057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002537798,0.0001596313,0.000191802,0.0007895376,0.0004114469,0.0005589835,0.0005464077,0.0003055644,0.0002110281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005637143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001854063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01314482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03297967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994329,0.0001058076,0.00004550097,0.0001960736,0.0001149574,0.0001047925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971197,0.000622744,0.001280117,0.0001552245,0.0004795011,0.0003428278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001438944,0.00004855081,0.9903858,0.0000214858,0.00007766038,0.00004196913,0.0005938858,0.000228022,0.002644944,0.00005495922,0.0001016026,0.005657275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000102454,0.00002828976,0.9991959,0.00000173885,0.00000371435,0.0000320231,0.0002859361,0.0002781986,0.0000595447,0.00001720378,0.00009388741,0.00000246236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999421,0.00004646595,0.00008877977,0.00001335188,0.000001318623,0.000003071582,0.0001393202,0.000003349839,0.0002832577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994674,0.00001861856,0.0001158204,0.000008909589,0.000003099255,0.000005329543,0.0002088549,0.000001452304,0.0001705108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01314482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02613664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0365365754617851,"score_gpt":0.2833219829149059,"score_spread":0.2467854074531208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}