{"id":"W2007229764","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.005","title":"Acquisition of Relevance implicatures: A case against a Rationality-based account of conversational implicatures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; McGill University","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Linguistics; Situated; Computer science; Relevance theory; Psychology; Cognitive science; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007429932,0.0001093788,0.0002798155,0.0001354248,0.00005264451,0.00001397322,0.0001674658,0.0001310841,0.0002884396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542019,0.00009033877,0.0001419179,0.0001399331,0.0001014378,0.00008098577,0.00001905107,0.0004675823,0.000006361407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000292259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002535104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006884928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009763713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985684,0.00007851974,0.0007821782,0.0001110867,0.0003397669,0.0001201091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973164,0.0005060214,0.001327021,0.0002136346,0.0005687645,0.00006818013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001955677,0.002900352,0.03349777,0.0008682535,0.001089163,0.000686916,0.01211068,0.001381801,0.6535695,0.2445034,0.0343457,0.01309081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009506784,0.001418021,0.8700373,0.000825743,0.0004115197,0.007860404,0.002618645,0.001178374,0.03076228,0.01453528,0.05995668,0.0008890003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945849,0.0001461318,0.002286431,0.001534534,0.0003860039,0.0001358201,0.00005365041,0.000007390079,0.0008651147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823765,0.000007970513,0.0168593,0.0004862678,0.0002101962,0.000003352504,0.00001629754,0.00001126655,0.00002886754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3683908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01162429082116027,"score_gpt":0.3086297154305622,"score_spread":0.2970054246094019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}