{"id":"W2007229764","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.005","title":"Acquisition of Relevance implicatures: A case against a Rationality-based account of conversational implicatures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; McGill University","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Linguistics; Situated; Computer science; Relevance theory; Psychology; Cognitive science; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01743274,0.0006049207,0.000684292,0.001443328,0.001492478,0.005189807,0.002550357,0.004265734,0.00553055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06503008,0.001364816,0.0008292996,0.0006329329,0.012574,0.01818021,0.006097412,0.007537243,0.0008708029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001596023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002601835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002648348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001831586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9851462,0.006792301,0.000936273,0.002261572,0.003748515,0.001115188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9350548,0.04116313,0.004336657,0.01247489,0.00570968,0.00126081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002960333,0.0001493202,0.01114429,0.0003004165,0.00009048813,0.001657607,0.05646328,0.001150201,0.01410391,0.8546242,0.002848639,0.05717167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001245816,0.00008633109,0.01227104,0.0001867492,0.0001370464,0.002739283,0.01003991,0.01051675,0.01182423,0.9270247,0.02488134,0.0001680242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.50384,0.001319501,0.2511624,0.04685418,0.0003340983,0.0001775796,0.0003997676,0.00100211,0.1949103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852375,0.0001447069,0.01151658,0.0007019906,0.0000791825,0.00003806947,0.00006591177,0.000200717,0.002015281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01743274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0921942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01162429082116027,"score_gpt":0.3086297154305622,"score_spread":0.2970054246094019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}