{"id":"W2007304033","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00571.x","title":"Diversity Relationships among Taxonomic Groups in Recovering and Restored Forests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Diversity (politics); Ecology; Community structure; Alpha diversity; Geography; Species diversity; Plant diversity; Taxonomic rank; Ecosystem; Plant community; Biology; Taxon","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025756,0.00005215907,0.00007366423,0.00003862852,0.0003955709,0.000002838136,0.00005417238,0.00008527263,0.00007324404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001415709,0.00005504412,0.000009978562,0.00007799808,0.0002312845,0.0001794546,0.0002924263,0.00009529139,0.0000407688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003365818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003851528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09057242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995127,0.00008217939,0.0001256179,0.0001574872,0.00001922527,0.0001027755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996832,0.0001680342,0.00006010743,0.00006282802,0.000004477751,0.00002132578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008789722,0.00000820133,0.996364,9.75279e-7,0.000002908938,3.521344e-7,0.0004017116,0.000572265,0.00005832466,0.00205567,0.0001791593,0.0003476299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002272764,0.00001525439,0.9865758,0.000002181807,0.000002524989,9.944278e-7,0.00004858838,0.008616566,0.000004640862,0.003580928,0.0008661951,0.00005898927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964149,0.00002782553,0.0005604323,0.001402672,0.00005630944,0.0001033729,0.000001464038,0.00001699723,0.001416038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986895,0.00003473963,0.0008314223,0.0002621565,0.0000109889,0.00001295614,0.000008997139,0.000002094493,0.0001471885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09018727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9260222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03522688397240448,"score_gpt":0.2249890009233377,"score_spread":0.1897621169509333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}