{"id":"W2007304033","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00571.x","title":"Diversity Relationships among Taxonomic Groups in Recovering and Restored Forests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Diversity (politics); Ecology; Community structure; Alpha diversity; Geography; Species diversity; Plant diversity; Taxonomic rank; Ecosystem; Plant community; Biology; Taxon","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004242484,0.0001077398,0.0001546775,0.0008463786,0.0005455964,0.0004866507,0.0001835861,0.0001363663,0.0005970123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001401618,0.00009163387,0.00006601562,0.0004232349,0.0007428929,0.0002455944,0.0004518698,0.0001884236,0.00006855845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006967547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002921567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02705071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05996766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996921,0.00007339021,0.00001900605,0.00007723635,0.00008285034,0.00005557017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907,0.0001513604,0.000325427,0.00007578071,0.0002211691,0.0001563129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001565097,0.00002284975,0.990261,0.00001331325,0.00002409406,0.00003861679,0.001391246,0.0001343941,0.003808357,0.000110887,0.00005178829,0.003986985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002182927,0.00002615427,0.9987348,0.000002863733,0.000003145307,0.00004978587,0.0004671503,0.0003570495,0.0002044626,0.00004683153,0.000103736,0.000001942374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997454,0.00002280054,0.00005811875,0.000003099511,3.000592e-7,0.000001600779,0.00003086169,0.00000109602,0.0001365231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998236,0.000006045396,0.00006166322,0.000001987641,3.733139e-7,0.000001025888,0.00005719386,3.261644e-7,0.00004774485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02705071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05378652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03522688397240448,"score_gpt":0.2249890009233377,"score_spread":0.1897621169509333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}