{"id":"W2007330472","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.040","title":"Ecological risk assessment of lead contamination at rifle and pistol ranges using techniques to account for site characteristics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Rifle; Contamination; Environmental science; Risk assessment; Lead (geology); Ecology; Geography; Biology; Archaeology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005142753,0.0005377172,0.0002316087,0.001353702,0.0003664519,0.0004027871,0.0005103518,0.0003201621,0.0005842472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00099123,0.0002484046,0.0005165489,0.0009928803,0.0001945197,0.0003890766,0.0005662002,0.0002101099,0.00008142959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007639294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004263007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01380705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04712168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997792,0.00009284103,0.00000828361,0.00003267962,0.000063828,0.00002305392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996301,0.0001765808,0.00007931317,0.00002611712,0.00007291609,0.00001495393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007158336,0.0001611651,0.597714,0.0001270966,0.0003418736,0.0009773141,0.000370693,0.2717496,0.0398769,0.00220973,0.0002235579,0.08553229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004821282,0.0007391005,0.4976933,0.00001078707,0.0003854208,0.0007538412,0.000481218,0.4783578,0.01885712,0.002029646,0.0006030186,0.00004060124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905887,0.00004229764,0.008043852,0.00002047053,0.000001092068,0.00002131164,0.00008508126,0.00002445778,0.001172872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904269,0.00005389341,0.008888166,0.000003285053,0.000001115581,0.00002195605,0.00007212375,0.000005322788,0.0005272944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01380705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02745336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02142643057942416,"score_gpt":0.2943703477915113,"score_spread":0.2729439172120872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}