{"id":"W2007345197","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2010.08.015","title":"Quantifying the accuracy of numerical collapse predictions for the design of submarine pressure hulls","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thin-Walled Structures","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Hull; Nonlinear system; Rotational symmetry; Finite element method; Submarine; Range (aeronautics); Shell (structure); Structural engineering; Engineering; Mechanics; Geology; Marine engineering; Mechanical engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003992981,0.0001952825,0.0003582032,0.00005962827,0.0002598779,0.00003638305,0.0006106508,0.0001948041,0.0003030123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001066484,0.0000985523,0.0002503203,0.0002907806,0.000284719,0.00008511906,0.00005987596,0.000621784,8.169403e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000938983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003816513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003083685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001683973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988341,0.00007807879,0.000443304,0.0001684886,0.0002589243,0.0002170471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964732,0.002555416,0.0001424239,0.0005857868,0.0001980056,0.00004516229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001480327,0.00002145969,0.0004429486,0.0002590161,0.001243158,3.420499e-7,0.003109104,0.9409064,0.0392382,0.01021886,0.002634316,0.001778139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006511877,0.00009862286,0.02283112,0.00002822784,0.001014643,0.00001990532,0.0008776793,0.9177887,0.03793518,0.01367175,0.004804261,0.0002787377],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7713417,0.003214113,0.2135189,0.002586875,0.00417519,0.003582876,0.0004460854,0.0004739319,0.0006603382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953239,0.000109609,0.004224949,0.00002497455,0.0001613869,0.00004313747,0.000008189443,0.00002146597,0.00008236392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2239822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4018846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02967095014569776,"score_gpt":0.2775690589267102,"score_spread":0.2478981087810124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}