{"id":"W2007782981","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00031.x","title":"Spatial Targeting of Conservation Tillage to Improve Water Quality and Carbon Retention Benefits","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Tillage; Watershed; Soil carbon; Soil conservation; Riparian zone; Water quality; Environmental resource management; Hydrology (agriculture); Agriculture; Soil water; Ecology; Soil science; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005528761,0.0003111268,0.0003773383,0.0004056306,0.0003205154,0.0007825597,0.0008264128,0.0005456149,0.002221722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001227004,0.0002304402,0.0005358824,0.0005833827,0.0004807385,0.001157725,0.0005419158,0.0003010033,0.0001336966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002696778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002622084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04841173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06747828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997948,0.00006318411,0.000006999298,0.00004423811,0.00004693241,0.00004380143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996376,0.000150301,0.0001047053,0.00002481999,0.00004997241,0.00003257266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000215112,0.0000319886,0.003741067,0.00001380486,0.00001831734,0.00003515654,0.00002017617,0.9835197,0.0009361738,0.006935834,0.0001064638,0.004619656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000139617,0.00004836433,0.003432486,0.000004802474,0.00002274794,0.00002178517,0.00005842889,0.9905262,0.0005447516,0.004300534,0.001018805,0.000007147604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6535174,0.0003315619,0.3208449,0.001001038,0.0000285774,0.0001529715,0.000660434,0.0003251182,0.02313811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776707,0.0001732152,0.02008498,0.00002773828,0.000004875395,0.00004273591,0.00008694743,0.00001768809,0.001891064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04841173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09625989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0162893946134538,"score_gpt":0.1665979270833629,"score_spread":0.1503085324699091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}