{"id":"W2007782981","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00031.x","title":"Spatial Targeting of Conservation Tillage to Improve Water Quality and Carbon Retention Benefits","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Tillage; Watershed; Soil carbon; Soil conservation; Riparian zone; Water quality; Environmental resource management; Hydrology (agriculture); Agriculture; Soil water; Ecology; Soil science; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004747009,0.0001912885,0.0003683049,0.0001147628,0.0001115981,0.00005675586,0.0002262909,0.0001012692,0.00009402417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005061528,0.0001490333,0.0001053993,0.00005689827,0.00009320246,0.0004117912,0.00004452063,0.0001333113,0.00001668727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001270811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000625613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1458943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7193614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983344,0.00003432592,0.0008469474,0.0002756462,0.00001981787,0.0004888545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984361,0.00003098727,0.0004205456,0.0001288308,0.00006358438,0.0009199609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001599366,0.00003549093,0.9136289,0.00007245646,0.0001481614,0.00001557129,0.006113239,0.04318593,0.008784885,0.001610218,0.001274646,0.02497057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001117798,0.000481968,0.9785877,0.00005955048,0.00006545615,0.0001302062,0.0009088496,0.002174888,0.006291759,0.001519672,0.008009937,0.0006521548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937271,0.00004039035,0.000003888444,0.004934782,0.0005435908,0.0001842172,0.00007766944,0.0000038791,0.0004844103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988144,0.00002050873,0.0002870247,0.0003777043,0.0003143387,0.000003674769,0.00003318983,0.00001207642,0.0001370517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5734671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8597932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0162893946134538,"score_gpt":0.1665979270833629,"score_spread":0.1503085324699091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}