{"id":"W2007919131","doi":"10.5558/tfc85277-2","title":"Institutional vacuums in Canadian forest policy: Can criteria and indicators and certification of sustainable forest management fill the void?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Certified wood; Certification; Business; Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Incentive; Property rights; Environmental resource management; Sustainable development; Sustainable management; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Forestry; Economics; Political science; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01710872,0.0002867305,0.0005786414,0.003104907,0.01912206,0.01309923,0.002261461,0.00285797,0.00351811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03615825,0.0004509249,0.0004534171,0.004192273,0.02029,0.005887844,0.004601037,0.004256341,0.0001534576],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2410816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3869947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839824,0.003082546,0.0004736683,0.0009172108,0.005752818,0.00579122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741153,0.007138254,0.002146445,0.0008600517,0.01066605,0.005073909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003889106,0.00004377413,0.01635073,0.0001868222,0.00001982752,0.0001730876,0.01118416,0.002294354,0.00043335,0.9014031,0.01988894,0.04798301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008504675,0.00007815307,0.1340048,0.001699823,0.0001141685,0.0001374721,0.05582356,0.00757422,0.001216856,0.2879282,0.5108111,0.0005265677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2997567,0.01708415,0.01108985,0.3653509,0.0007857585,0.0002969364,0.001015911,0.0001604853,0.3044593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822515,0.002665481,0.002172419,0.004677277,0.00005842507,0.00004509133,0.0001063603,0.00001773907,0.008005843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7589185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8802378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006988512765672143,"score_gpt":0.2318654692777101,"score_spread":0.2248769565120379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}