{"id":"W2008009932","doi":"10.1007/s10531-011-0148-3","title":"The efficacy of common species as indicators: avian responses to disturbance in British Columbia, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Guild; Common species; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biology; Species diversity; Rare species; Relative species abundance; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001842906,0.00003528708,0.00007317343,0.00001108401,0.0001904729,0.00003548889,0.0001371999,0.00002585371,0.0001002523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001000261,0.00004604525,0.000009713859,0.0001806068,0.000133543,0.00007902253,0.00009177122,0.0000388899,0.00001888028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002849873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994731,0.00007751533,0.00009893282,0.0001174493,0.0001380702,0.0000949328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996449,0.0001427905,0.00006077461,0.0001019075,0.000005079153,0.00004450094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003688252,0.00002259069,0.9896278,0.000004204171,0.000002495954,0.000008340969,0.0003743774,1.00228e-7,0.00005114765,0.000004027129,0.00737832,0.002489738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001627699,0.00004145559,0.9867529,0.00001735885,0.000003087392,0.000001826323,0.0002976415,0.000004585225,0.0001403768,0.00001002246,0.01251192,0.00005601921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998638,0.00002295697,7.763855e-7,0.0003817788,0.00006411701,0.0001988161,0.00004349936,0.000005931335,0.0006441281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999253,0.00001044791,0.00001713177,0.0003029906,0.000002785925,0.000002521469,0.000003406104,0.000001061582,0.0004066154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007746271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1877671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01103155997379445,"score_gpt":0.1711309428886446,"score_spread":0.1600993829148502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}