{"id":"W2008101372","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.002","title":"On the estimation of returns to scale, technical progress and monopolistic markups","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Monopolistic competition; Economics; Returns to scale; Econometrics; Scale (ratio); Value (mathematics); Gross output; Estimation; Technical progress; Scale effects; Technical change; Economies of scale; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Production (economics); Mathematics; Statistics; Monopoly; Productivity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001451847,0.000122103,0.0004848827,0.0009819126,0.00009013228,0.00003352131,0.0002713558,0.00008192642,0.00008148577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001656544,0.0001047205,0.0001159386,0.0006653427,0.0001511618,0.0002421031,0.0000565879,0.00024531,0.00004187863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001070016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003456467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001042198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003650305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985909,0.00002072312,0.0009541022,0.0002082452,0.00004309693,0.0001829242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981124,0.0004238402,0.0009720678,0.0002768838,0.00006900232,0.0001457393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003736397,0.0006964369,0.6372123,0.0001482484,0.0001908551,0.00001863883,0.001025177,0.002479981,0.00002130313,0.3337152,0.01367067,0.01044753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001094936,0.001571661,0.8406255,0.00006768482,0.00002936963,0.0003868486,0.00009559155,0.00376964,0.0004535441,0.1461198,0.005306639,0.0004787918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892709,0.001326981,0.001675595,0.002256112,0.0003271566,0.0001837317,0.00004998337,0.000005519159,0.004904019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960779,0.0002924203,0.003200383,0.000187796,0.0001169119,0.000005017159,9.151177e-7,0.00001358862,0.0001050775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2034132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4270377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09660245066921329,"score_gpt":0.2336639383760438,"score_spread":0.1370614877068305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}