{"id":"W2008114983","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.004","title":"The why of the “Hau”: scarcity, gifts, and environmentalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Environmentalism; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Generalization; Ecological economics; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Neoclassical economics; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Political science; Sustainability; Microeconomics; Law; Epistemology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003137513,0.0001984313,0.0004635199,0.0006953597,0.002755841,0.004445787,0.0004521089,0.003178606,0.006922387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008981578,0.0001816525,0.0002195938,0.0007661435,0.02533029,0.008805572,0.001911734,0.002872702,0.0005060924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001707169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008202079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002253524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002320464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989141,0.000682067,0.000020292,0.0001062303,0.000144261,0.000133135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952163,0.00309209,0.0004455819,0.0004238756,0.0003249734,0.0004972565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405524,0.00004230032,0.003381446,0.00005082994,0.00001513489,0.0000779094,0.002252893,0.0002367041,0.0001945011,0.9649013,0.01274455,0.01602829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001864908,0.00001091524,0.002171637,0.0000466536,0.000006822712,0.0001020657,0.002168096,0.0002758681,0.00007967074,0.9701624,0.02494587,0.00001133682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2048497,0.01896218,0.01105332,0.5042911,0.001362466,0.00002066612,0.0001339752,0.00007368897,0.2592529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851257,0.001805177,0.0007589466,0.007048584,0.0005438089,0.0000124772,0.00001136748,0.00002420923,0.004669724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006922387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02315772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007463262999884049,"score_gpt":0.1526068610387696,"score_spread":0.1451435980388856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}