{"id":"W2008114983","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.004","title":"The why of the “Hau”: scarcity, gifts, and environmentalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Environmentalism; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Generalization; Ecological economics; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Neoclassical economics; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Political science; Sustainability; Microeconomics; Law; Epistemology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001884603,0.00006652748,0.00007159977,0.000005283257,0.000386776,0.0000254494,0.0002868415,0.00004236695,0.000371077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001527651,0.00003739171,0.0000480282,0.00003285682,0.0006719883,0.00004179717,0.0008141036,0.00005977965,0.00006201085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001444191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003535321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001576084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006408297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995129,0.00002679855,0.0001247335,0.0001550626,0.00005350573,0.0001270057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996615,0.0000520469,0.00007412033,0.0001745516,9.795879e-7,0.00003677161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000877458,0.00009022802,0.9906709,0.000002218983,0.00001500809,6.936112e-7,0.0002316717,0.00418026,0.00007737281,0.001405174,0.0006384398,0.002679315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002078462,0.00003012586,0.9312899,8.577761e-7,0.000008150884,0.00000122252,0.0001939436,0.00009219794,0.00009943834,0.004720856,0.06330145,0.00005398452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876604,0.00002402179,0.000008914227,0.006585558,0.00008879476,0.0001685942,0.000005121609,0.000006152748,0.005452409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976386,0.0002513331,0.00009237471,0.001618083,0.00001232532,0.000003711034,8.810396e-7,0.000002157742,0.0003804873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06266301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4063033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007463262999884049,"score_gpt":0.1526068610387696,"score_spread":0.1451435980388856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}