{"id":"W2008147283","doi":"10.1007/s00371-014-0936-3","title":"Optimizing line-of-sight using simplified regular terrains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Visual Computer","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Terrain; Computer science; Subdivision; Raised-relief map; Residual; Line-of-sight; Line (geometry); Terrain rendering; Set (abstract data type); Algorithm; A priori and a posteriori; Triangulation; Sight; Scheme (mathematics); Data mining; Computer vision; Rendering (computer graphics); Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005170855,0.000130271,0.0001650347,0.0001254671,0.0001940725,0.0001156208,0.0006015555,0.00004479153,0.000006350251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001843917,0.00009551063,0.00008198367,0.0004400311,0.00005086525,0.0002280364,0.0003350987,0.00009989514,0.00001340388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001865472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004026794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007791577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001331275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988223,0.0001766628,0.0002722653,0.0002653649,0.0002684523,0.0001949537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990998,0.0002112968,0.0001311329,0.000383744,0.0001192966,0.00005475389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001843956,0.0001436431,0.00003630905,0.00003317103,0.00006035232,0.000003043571,0.002132678,0.6911966,0.02850619,0.1001691,0.0006291056,0.1770713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002063337,0.0001432423,0.0002365985,0.00001898114,0.000007414571,0.00001439537,0.000004086381,0.9823937,0.0110365,0.00316864,0.002644067,0.0001260814],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1517944,0.00003665083,0.8469769,0.0003415308,0.0004895843,0.00009697195,3.937816e-7,0.00006916415,0.000194484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8043967,0.000001204674,0.1944341,0.0005375557,0.0005612728,0.000001894312,0.000003739552,0.00000775328,0.00005573141],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6526024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.389481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03365001007169213,"score_gpt":0.2978994226802775,"score_spread":0.2642494126085854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}