{"id":"W2008147283","doi":"10.1007/s00371-014-0936-3","title":"Optimizing line-of-sight using simplified regular terrains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Visual Computer","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Terrain; Computer science; Subdivision; Raised-relief map; Residual; Line-of-sight; Line (geometry); Terrain rendering; Set (abstract data type); Algorithm; A priori and a posteriori; Triangulation; Sight; Scheme (mathematics); Data mining; Computer vision; Rendering (computer graphics); Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004225395,0.0008227771,0.001190335,0.0009157307,0.0004606323,0.0008176332,0.001482753,0.001175181,0.005240104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002997757,0.0008637341,0.0006862349,0.001149189,0.0005481753,0.001086117,0.001077772,0.0008619689,0.0008489763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000783789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008802832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01442999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995944,0.0001059354,0.00001496362,0.00006858988,0.0001591056,0.00005697254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990487,0.0005193497,0.00006654259,0.0001425974,0.0001666961,0.00005612203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000555165,0.00003452349,0.0002964218,0.00003056119,0.00001582866,0.00003361913,0.00002939273,0.9770529,0.00135254,0.002231231,0.0007338308,0.01813353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007053247,0.000007402582,0.00002956854,0.000001149381,0.00000177965,0.000005376559,0.000005314878,0.9987887,0.0002341221,0.0007651378,0.0001526995,0.000001766361],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06125417,0.0001435251,0.9314849,0.000104623,0.00005406941,0.00008522454,0.0002461064,0.001426939,0.005200342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.609533,0.0001171654,0.385988,0.00005963308,0.00003573328,0.0001013713,0.0005204855,0.0007073837,0.002937189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02152157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03365001007169213,"score_gpt":0.2978994226802775,"score_spread":0.2642494126085854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}