{"id":"W2008237219","doi":"10.1897/ieam_2008-026.1","title":"A new quality assurance system for the evaluation of ecotoxicity studies submitted under the new substances notification regulations in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Teck (Canada); Intrinsik (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ecotoxicity; Context (archaeology); Ranking (information retrieval); Usability; Quality (philosophy); Environmental planning; Quality assurance; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Business; Environmental protection; Geography; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009775691,0.0002029422,0.0002412599,0.00003372785,0.0004121634,0.00001132455,0.0002602696,0.00005675438,0.0003110694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001027779,0.0001324079,0.00004953699,0.000212292,0.0003318233,0.0001506973,0.0001388628,0.0001345524,0.000006009961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002910513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001176068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07478782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5982774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980543,0.0002651051,0.0004988459,0.0003822962,0.0005420719,0.0002573874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989909,0.000355441,0.0002623601,0.0003248314,0.000005012229,0.00006147549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003118107,0.0005322667,0.7028517,0.0001339565,0.0009889482,0.000009210166,0.001766273,0.1732827,0.01772388,0.004837879,0.02923373,0.06832765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001082842,0.00004763243,0.9785922,0.0000228131,0.0001327567,0.000004538414,0.00954888,0.006092869,0.002423217,0.0005381328,0.001353743,0.0001603389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989386,0.0007069376,0.004844924,0.001713106,0.0002603386,0.002038208,0.00002331383,0.00001265499,0.001014507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996331,0.001023398,0.001202461,0.0001766588,0.00001814091,0.000354553,0.00002927931,0.00001082611,0.0008536587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5234897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9313732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06086284937318485,"score_gpt":0.3188166884360651,"score_spread":0.2579538390628803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}