{"id":"W2008283662","doi":"10.3758/bf03194128","title":"Inhibition of return: Unraveling a paradox","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Neural dynamics and brain function","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inhibition of return; Cued speech; Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Response inhibition; Neuroscience; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Visual attention; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001792494,0.0004083879,0.0008133964,0.0004250935,0.000310474,0.001496127,0.001389956,0.001667453,0.001391977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004559285,0.000170807,0.0003225918,0.0003456842,0.003587023,0.002888706,0.0008046972,0.002341791,0.0004364756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005029517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008755765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004614301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003155548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999503,0.0001594414,0.00003754332,0.0001229412,0.0001253116,0.00005176636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997344,0.00165468,0.0003308232,0.0003083188,0.0002391258,0.000123097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009934333,0.0001888782,0.006847234,0.001505475,0.000241875,0.001054616,0.001087338,0.002870562,0.03115456,0.4056092,0.01029386,0.5381529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003146357,0.0007057842,0.02221448,0.0007824152,0.0002497534,0.006342603,0.0007459279,0.01150727,0.01603666,0.8072785,0.1336994,0.0001226151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2686451,0.4098959,0.1426375,0.08882228,0.005316839,0.00006595857,0.000231791,0.0005123393,0.08387225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075195,0.07060985,0.008324599,0.005897377,0.003334202,0.00004100446,0.00006018506,0.000103628,0.004109713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001792494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009479702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0333457395960436,"score_gpt":0.2883044155192788,"score_spread":0.2549586759232352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}