{"id":"W2008286589","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.012","title":"Multiple lines of evidence to identify the sources of fecal pollution at a freshwater beach in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Research","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Intertidal zone; Fecal coliform; Pollution; Environmental science; Bay; Wastewater; Swash; Water pollution; Contamination; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Water quality; Environmental engineering; Oceanography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006319602,0.00009534969,0.0001523266,0.0001467989,0.0001291613,0.00002858692,0.0004442255,0.00007313,0.001252818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001822627,0.00004967873,0.00005483309,0.0002863155,0.000371231,0.0001833483,0.0005495786,0.000259668,0.000252222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003484816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001209179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08838407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8570721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974692,0.0003739964,0.0004088104,0.0002826736,0.0009734091,0.0004918465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993484,0.0001350075,0.00003802872,0.0003245603,0.00005515909,0.00009884829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000220108,0.00008564332,0.6798263,0.0000211367,0.000003803041,0.000006848815,0.01410616,0.0001484791,0.3043846,0.000005931849,0.000442345,0.0007486619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001824645,0.00007821225,0.6112972,0.00003836791,0.000001515198,0.000001148386,0.0001076611,0.00009065224,0.3744504,0.00006940355,0.01362851,0.00005443928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977542,0.00001534173,0.0001176996,0.001356333,0.00004678078,0.0004028077,0.000008258268,0.000007432961,0.0002911192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918799,0.000002230079,0.0001395967,0.00008698961,0.00002007039,0.00001658188,0.000008968353,0.000007658439,0.007837949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.768688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.176411034025507,"score_gpt":0.3960095459992715,"score_spread":0.2195985119737646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}