{"id":"W2008339985","doi":"10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00371-5","title":"Practical application of kinetic data in risk assessment—an IPCS initiative","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Toxicology Letters","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Risk assessment; Toxicodynamics; Harmonization; Risk analysis (engineering); Probabilistic logic; Chemical safety; Computer science; Population; Toxicokinetics; Econometrics; Business; Medicine; Environmental health; Pharmacology; Mathematics; Biology; Political science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007888192,0.001790607,0.002677331,0.002900185,0.0005822481,0.002613005,0.003377469,0.003631495,0.003062981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004680467,0.0008013635,0.0008299695,0.003491626,0.002295122,0.003941327,0.001324179,0.003613741,0.001907631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002605482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003161365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003046266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002069684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998587,0.0003383773,0.0001439034,0.0001327983,0.0007479024,0.00004994398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948585,0.002554977,0.000220844,0.0003451867,0.001895992,0.000124474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000851129,0.0002062949,0.0001923025,0.003655403,0.00009307358,0.0002772499,0.00009000488,0.005421225,0.003390394,0.03233932,0.0581592,0.8960904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003427907,0.0001381747,0.0004760533,0.00168323,0.00008985655,0.0006013495,0.00009070797,0.002056836,0.004347085,0.03337687,0.9570528,0.00005275185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008701805,0.949107,0.02390312,0.008665575,0.003797385,0.00005070435,0.0001438617,0.0001786893,0.01328361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009424848,0.96105,0.01801283,0.002743465,0.002033689,0.00008305558,0.0002058297,0.00004513776,0.006401075],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007888192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04171729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08781876368164344,"score_gpt":0.4271355896069765,"score_spread":0.3393168259253331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}