{"id":"W2008381785","doi":"10.4296/cwrj3504543","title":"Analyse Sociologique de l’Allocation de l’Eau Souterraine : L’Exemple de Franklin, Québec","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multitude; Sustainability; Relation (database); Bottling line; Welfare economics; Resource (disambiguation); Sociology; Political science; Geography; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006756969,0.000211589,0.0002088014,0.0008452494,0.009566033,0.003111899,0.0008286115,0.0009566913,0.006379637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001083793,0.0001355548,0.000248206,0.001674069,0.003810569,0.0009379186,0.001133183,0.00112654,0.0002162203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09203063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03714507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993519,0.0001957789,0.000009363615,0.00007224559,0.0001350858,0.0002355074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993755,0.000179696,0.00003679295,0.00002763734,0.0002868825,0.00009351393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001926932,0.0002046938,0.09888536,0.0001800214,0.0001162148,0.004197177,0.1201883,0.01057685,0.00393603,0.5917903,0.05522371,0.1145085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004240262,0.00006956718,0.2551529,0.0002582445,0.00006917844,0.0004839445,0.1370913,0.008721196,0.001097544,0.01833417,0.5785381,0.0001414652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7569462,0.00319636,0.004244915,0.02255853,0.00008165499,0.000119445,0.001142812,0.00004098547,0.211669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555714,0.0008701575,0.000986463,0.0005443385,0.0000146583,0.00002966142,0.0001276924,0.00001473367,0.04184076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09203063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6677321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01913041656660344,"score_gpt":0.2315065435564488,"score_spread":0.2123761269898454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}