{"id":"W2008398116","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00051-1","title":"Evaluative metadiscursive comments and face-work in conversational discourse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Construct (python library); Face (sociological concept); Affect (linguistics); Linguistics; Conversation analysis; Discourse analysis; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107681,0.0007459,0.0005650567,0.002161747,0.00637389,0.008076163,0.001668454,0.003653263,0.01023003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07616737,0.0007345529,0.0003387788,0.001713315,0.00739944,0.01473725,0.006494725,0.003586038,0.001351538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002541255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001462252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001680815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001759551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780725,0.01715129,0.0005095677,0.001240166,0.002299882,0.0007267044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8970175,0.08724184,0.003544179,0.004398381,0.006639024,0.001159054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008897968,0.0001637068,0.005653959,0.0006198213,0.00003183389,0.001128945,0.5775055,0.0008039088,0.01042169,0.343765,0.005830559,0.05318527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001670737,0.0003206518,0.01058437,0.0009313999,0.0001139696,0.001667312,0.4549188,0.03083673,0.02637075,0.3464582,0.1273874,0.0002433206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5527726,0.0009766939,0.2140089,0.0132382,0.0005944707,0.0003754991,0.0006553596,0.00106306,0.2163153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829654,0.00008322865,0.009907886,0.0002022816,0.0001427242,0.0001291467,0.0001230889,0.0002334668,0.006212819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05694783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04574994219080977,"score_gpt":0.3229865131530607,"score_spread":0.277236570962251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}