{"id":"W2008519505","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550360405","title":"On diagnostic checking of the autoregressive conditional intensity model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autoregressive model; Goodness of fit; Econometrics; Statistics; Multivariate statistics; Independence (probability theory); Mathematics; Residual; Studentized residual; STAR model; Time series; Autoregressive integrated moving average; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001867695,0.00007481904,0.0002516441,0.0001411116,0.0001797275,0.00001033252,0.0001747867,0.00005073766,0.00005778411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002356729,0.00006848071,0.00007589167,0.00007267477,0.0001774313,0.00006426407,0.000008876395,0.0002294298,0.000008985968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001458423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005829096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001820731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001938829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991983,0.000007705749,0.0005043382,0.00008307541,0.00005241514,0.00015413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987859,0.0001936862,0.0005230092,0.0001180815,0.0002291477,0.0001502141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001771866,0.00002849515,0.119644,0.00001932675,0.00003853585,0.00009164755,0.00184461,0.06246526,0.000002567257,0.803173,0.01237034,0.0003044992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004170199,0.0001010376,0.2734423,0.0001176846,0.00001409659,0.00007050405,0.00004193857,0.1779468,0.00005152199,0.5465539,0.001081503,0.0001617277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7243744,0.0006211017,0.2702887,0.0003319041,0.0006618591,0.00007726804,0.00274603,0.000001791495,0.0008969579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963524,0.00005233577,0.003261925,0.0001824075,0.00005651845,5.238551e-7,0.00000587168,0.000008570134,0.00007949732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.271978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2821396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05268777459283978,"score_gpt":0.2056652910927427,"score_spread":0.1529775164999029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}