{"id":"W2008629840","doi":"10.1057/jit.2008.20","title":"Exploring An Alternative Method of Evaluating the Effects of Erp: A Multiple Case Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Technology","topic":"ERP Systems Implementation and Impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Enterprise resource planning; Balanced scorecard; Computer science; Process management; Information system; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Contextualization; Process (computing); Business process; Soft systems methodology; Strategic information system; Management science; Business; Management information systems; Marketing; Work in process; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03503999,0.001191836,0.0009486796,0.00625926,0.00211637,0.003860229,0.002603979,0.002573815,0.005629716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03997101,0.0005912675,0.001682477,0.004398751,0.002302487,0.005233504,0.003105638,0.001510494,0.0005075797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003120364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003101999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002573424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003807642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9479137,0.04312632,0.001962066,0.002697046,0.003631772,0.0006690638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9360489,0.04964095,0.003596455,0.004419568,0.005594981,0.0006991391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002637732,0.009773615,0.06402476,0.005320721,0.001113059,0.004925858,0.09370607,0.01711831,0.03871531,0.1896926,0.003520931,0.569451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005135897,0.03463114,0.1131886,0.005755247,0.004124887,0.006997662,0.2144763,0.2140384,0.1048568,0.1365079,0.1591284,0.0011586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4547891,0.001002265,0.4953363,0.001212832,0.0001893846,0.01372929,0.0007294221,0.0001466897,0.03286462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5586742,0.0004229365,0.4270557,0.0002420637,0.00004196712,0.01075746,0.0001780519,0.0000390254,0.002588686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03503999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1853114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1096072852708492,"score_gpt":0.3948696329946176,"score_spread":0.2852623477237685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}