{"id":"W2008653358","doi":"10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.140","title":"Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: A Monte Carlo investigation.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Shared Hierarchical Academic Research Computing Network","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Psychology; Personnel selection; Personality; Monte Carlo method; Social psychology; Job performance; Big Five personality traits; Statistics; Job satisfaction; Extraversion and introversion; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001726006,0.0001678722,0.0005837558,0.0002143903,0.00015836,0.00001013448,0.0003888563,0.0002051123,0.0003047891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000498764,0.0001132635,0.0001680307,0.0002845051,0.002340147,0.00005578748,0.00003139111,0.0005023991,0.00001563896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001180246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005655807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003386144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001212313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998024,0.0003384921,0.0008413662,0.0002667875,0.0002494584,0.0002799301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979554,0.000467183,0.0009291287,0.0003515505,0.000175193,0.0001215819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01351798,0.001681581,0.1664267,0.0001190513,0.002462261,0.0005588782,0.1560833,0.0001070381,0.01214075,0.4285099,0.1971706,0.02122187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02343949,0.0008216207,0.8743224,0.00004614015,0.0002779943,0.009132999,0.002968312,0.00002416069,0.0001659382,0.04099717,0.04737661,0.0004271657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.962349,0.0006994024,0.0005577329,0.003095172,0.001401379,0.0001880452,0.00001014985,0.00001115204,0.03168799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945092,0.0001428355,0.0006866625,0.004215576,0.0002609288,0.00001203361,7.136974e-7,0.00001529503,0.000156774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7078957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8622368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08332693656361063,"score_gpt":0.3410597794157542,"score_spread":0.2577328428521436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}