{"id":"W2008660299","doi":"10.1007/bf02486485","title":"Particle size distribution of fine powders by LASER diffraction spectrometry. Case of cementitious materials","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials and Structures","topic":"Mineral Processing and Grinding","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Sizing; Particle (ecology); Diffraction; Materials science; Particle-size distribution; Cementitious; Isotropy; Laser; Particle size; Solid mechanics; Computer science; Optics; Composite material; Physics; Chemistry; Cement; Engineering; Geology; Chemical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007408176,0.00009121411,0.0001838887,0.00001397868,0.00004063568,0.00004125828,0.00002603476,0.00004554129,0.000593869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000245365,0.00007802676,0.00001257166,0.00006227054,0.00002881422,0.00007666981,0.00001086397,0.00002102241,5.841735e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001134244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001872253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002125045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001060345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994817,0.0000172236,0.0002330932,0.00008401339,0.0000588549,0.0001250992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998024,0.00001842079,0.00006549107,0.00006894165,0.00001718706,0.00002761851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003133007,0.000008139839,0.0001287425,0.0001717152,0.00001902117,0.00001411923,0.00005347823,0.0001533173,0.9985793,0.0001262578,0.0003487793,0.0003658328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000284653,0.00003792951,0.003890937,0.00001783699,0.00002130873,0.0001129952,0.00004852879,0.00004792623,0.9946948,0.0006536357,0.0001051894,0.00008429794],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990107,0.000151307,0.0001194578,0.00001571199,0.000226285,0.00005263187,0.0003566302,0.00003230445,0.00003491886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996909,0.00006199636,0.00006693168,0.000003769563,0.00005757005,0.000002544958,0.00006855257,0.000009602311,0.0000381318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003884505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6502448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005723412575775078,"score_gpt":0.2149203299887262,"score_spread":0.2091969174129512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}