{"id":"W2008660299","doi":"10.1007/bf02486485","title":"Particle size distribution of fine powders by LASER diffraction spectrometry. Case of cementitious materials","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials and Structures","topic":"Mineral Processing and Grinding","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Sizing; Particle (ecology); Diffraction; Materials science; Particle-size distribution; Cementitious; Isotropy; Laser; Particle size; Solid mechanics; Computer science; Optics; Composite material; Physics; Chemistry; Cement; Engineering; Geology; Chemical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001966394,0.0001201577,0.0001785791,0.0006567358,0.0002183232,0.000258141,0.0003618137,0.0004534664,0.001837365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000514102,0.0001214559,0.000140081,0.0002608051,0.0001947253,0.0002646556,0.0001860916,0.0002970341,0.0004705898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000180713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001062065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001674286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002110888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998193,0.00001602162,0.00001468411,0.00005317205,0.00007902736,0.00001777004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997552,0.0001314479,0.00003107108,0.00002639582,0.0000454368,0.00001040098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001750597,0.00003366266,0.002560655,0.00008376857,0.00001209394,0.000164475,0.00006711438,0.0004924386,0.9847054,0.0004834102,0.0003572497,0.01086466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001152261,0.0001115655,0.02961457,0.0000157799,0.00002242989,0.001284589,0.00008945566,0.009040507,0.9542781,0.0004589357,0.005056904,0.00001575833],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513381,0.003737578,0.03233924,0.0001782026,0.00005577995,0.00005591806,0.001562696,0.0002719756,0.01046054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833604,0.0009592547,0.01201204,0.00004195162,0.00001625618,0.00002000613,0.0006186313,0.00002084602,0.002950607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001837365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00614661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005723412575775078,"score_gpt":0.2149203299887262,"score_spread":0.2091969174129512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}