{"id":"W2008689929","doi":"10.3905/jpe.2005.605367","title":"Assessing the Efficacy and Standardization Potential of Five Competing Venture Capital Investment Evaluation Approaches","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Private Equity","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Venture capital; Consistency (knowledge bases); Proposition; Investment (military); Constructive; Process (computing); Business; Capital budgeting; Capital investment; Actuarial science; Accounting; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005063026,0.0001399734,0.0002170888,0.00009399741,0.000334147,0.0003033977,0.00040719,0.00005617214,0.00004630256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004451914,0.00008008063,0.00008305896,0.000186417,0.0001759462,0.001472866,0.0004795559,0.0002979746,0.000003236044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008419554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005694469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001087891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005529932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983119,0.0001427808,0.0004934179,0.000101,0.0007649232,0.0001859263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983163,0.0001144032,0.001071019,0.000184829,0.0002970198,0.00001636714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002228858,0.002491802,0.01049612,0.00164124,0.002106755,0.00003335354,0.02653156,0.3480226,0.1396648,0.1570693,0.006426019,0.3032877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01876355,0.0005812942,0.5044565,0.00190958,0.006834251,0.0003637207,0.03148695,0.2783461,0.01705099,0.1178655,0.0206042,0.0017373],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989904,0.0009858757,0.004764946,0.002739654,0.0003070786,0.0002926955,0.000001650461,0.00001033138,0.0009937508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977443,0.00004498511,0.0003616539,0.000353541,0.001469084,0.000001217295,0.000008130509,0.00001165315,0.000005430868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4939604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3265593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06071564061921304,"score_gpt":0.3078758587995166,"score_spread":0.2471602181803036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}