{"id":"W2008716825","doi":"10.5558/tfc81265-2","title":"Plantations and biodiversity: A comment on the debate in New Brunswick","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Saint John Regional Hospital; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Agroforestry; Monoculture; Snag; Productivity; Global biodiversity; Forest management; Coarse woody debris; Forestry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001021868,0.00005866294,0.00005817945,0.000005474927,0.0004713174,0.00001978954,0.0001647694,0.00003289962,0.0001782963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001145047,0.00001642642,0.00002232015,0.0001068084,0.0001310854,0.00004157809,0.0001031393,0.00009534143,0.0001340539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003162491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001519067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002232671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03756653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996102,0.00003248085,0.00005501583,0.00009520014,0.00005748281,0.0001496014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996728,0.0002351589,0.00002333321,0.00003649318,0.000005329205,0.00002683293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001598069,0.0002031235,0.7137308,0.000003370081,0.00008209534,0.00001116467,0.001877616,0.0001687381,0.0003368333,0.01935243,0.2467157,0.0173584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001746623,0.0001197439,0.9244512,0.000005517028,0.0000102589,0.00000272033,0.0006205893,0.0001158462,0.0001285025,0.000329905,0.07398741,0.00005361289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8388239,0.0001172729,5.72594e-8,0.1605527,0.00002104616,0.0001009847,0.000014984,0.00001268202,0.0003563609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916989,0.0001160529,0.000003892921,0.007926522,0.00004764705,0.000001093621,0.000009489983,1.324353e-7,0.0001962316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2107205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9799954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02744227154080768,"score_gpt":0.2114394401937336,"score_spread":0.183997168652926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}