{"id":"W2008737807","doi":"10.1097/wnr.0b013e3280115942","title":"Callosal morphology in Williams syndrome: a new evaluation of shape and thickness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuroreport","topic":"Williams Syndrome Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital; McGill University","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Corpus callosum; Williams syndrome; Morphology (biology); Brain morphometry; Anatomy; Neuroscience; Large sample; Cognition; Psychology; Biology; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medicine; Zoology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007099268,0.0005290678,0.0003617964,0.002679069,0.0001848565,0.0007287671,0.0003190469,0.0004108732,0.000837805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00347122,0.000380793,0.0004019915,0.001087218,0.0004365664,0.0006820234,0.0006796061,0.0002475739,0.0001336637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002264178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002035859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001370126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001442624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996525,0.00008530183,0.00003825393,0.00005363127,0.000152819,0.00001749975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988864,0.0004274439,0.0002187927,0.0002256476,0.0001604514,0.00008139721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001700446,0.00008678278,0.2821694,0.0003478861,0.0005612833,0.001871808,0.002369543,0.05056415,0.5112798,0.002642629,0.0004855883,0.1459208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005344546,0.000473273,0.6371288,0.00005898324,0.0003211162,0.008479938,0.0009083297,0.2752655,0.07227498,0.002858605,0.002015742,0.0001612495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.95498,0.0001701182,0.04380211,0.00003271064,0.000008482089,0.00002921883,0.0001988463,0.0002158466,0.0005627016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96613,0.0001598771,0.03302623,0.000007387168,0.000007786853,0.0000423507,0.0002124439,0.00009798478,0.0003159138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002679069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003754437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0985049746560921,"score_gpt":0.368953900077372,"score_spread":0.2704489254212799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}