{"id":"W2008737807","doi":"10.1097/wnr.0b013e3280115942","title":"Callosal morphology in Williams syndrome: a new evaluation of shape and thickness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuroreport","topic":"Williams Syndrome Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital; McGill University","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Corpus callosum; Williams syndrome; Morphology (biology); Brain morphometry; Anatomy; Neuroscience; Large sample; Cognition; Psychology; Biology; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medicine; Zoology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002886675,0.0001486707,0.0002820176,0.0003514747,0.0000420385,0.0000184933,0.0002358712,0.0001278868,0.0002462697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003137972,0.0001440777,0.00004041874,0.0007482597,0.0002485094,0.0002073567,0.0001552375,0.0003465895,0.00002352077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006355927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003911453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002659521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007908355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967696,0.0002562264,0.0005909436,0.0006198878,0.001306767,0.0004565558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998749,0.0003650294,0.0001897591,0.0004075931,0.0001084752,0.000180173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007699865,0.0001908372,0.1638476,0.00004839686,0.000004623198,0.006192539,0.0002548417,0.00007498308,0.8112414,0.0003378949,0.0002211329,0.01750878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001184135,0.0002940003,0.8804411,0.00003797384,0.00002046807,0.01605426,0.00002549411,0.002385012,0.0975531,0.001504592,0.0003002077,0.0001997147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967539,0.00005556905,0.00006096585,0.0003165382,0.0002288352,0.0005020998,0.000002874049,0.00003302719,0.002046195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992923,0.00002404264,0.0001281334,0.0001536653,0.00002124365,0.00001189351,0.000002276352,0.00002573382,0.0003407635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7165934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.587532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0985049746560921,"score_gpt":0.368953900077372,"score_spread":0.2704489254212799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}