{"id":"W2008815158","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgm042","title":"A forensic approach to the interpretation of blood doping markers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"World Anti-Doping Agency","funders":"Bundesamt für Sport; World Anti-Doping Agency; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Prior probability; Odds; Population; Bayesian probability; Athletes; Fallacy; Statistics; Test (biology); Sorting; Medicine; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Algorithm; Physical therapy; Epistemology; Logistic regression","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759665,0.00005074485,0.0001001148,0.00001135144,0.000455109,0.00001581306,0.0001133586,0.00004497606,0.000005837412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000216007,0.000035021,0.00003894102,0.0001442029,0.0006624031,0.00008692036,0.00003730618,0.00007805002,0.000001369348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001533876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004160331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00648715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004494227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992108,0.0001732161,0.0001491414,0.0001656874,0.0001719876,0.0001291341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995649,0.00009998628,0.0000689239,0.0001677677,0.00005245042,0.00004598139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001383428,0.0003375776,0.3119723,0.0001609551,0.0001043905,0.000001536002,0.185158,0.001600083,0.000007676329,0.4758195,0.0004061956,0.02429338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00170671,0.0006741728,0.5994152,0.0004591,0.0006121062,0.0000535928,0.01984526,0.006228277,0.0004951615,0.309316,0.06002963,0.001164719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493543,0.00009980347,0.001249076,0.0003136203,0.0001068354,0.0005090648,0.000003542885,0.00003033276,0.04833346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371,0.00008010385,0.005968346,0.000080768,0.0000418042,0.00001986783,9.152703e-7,0.000002956476,0.00009523061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.287443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0210194790790406,"score_gpt":0.2551814619903546,"score_spread":0.234161982911314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}