{"id":"W2008873201","doi":"10.1139/v02-137","title":"Reciprocal donor acceptor selectivity (RDAS): A new concept for \"matching\" donors with acceptors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Chemistry","topic":"Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica; Rural Development Administration; Comunidad de Madrid","keywords":"Chemistry; Oxocarbenium; Regioselectivity; Acceptor; Trisaccharide; Anomer; Leaving group; Selectivity; Combinatorial chemistry; Stereoselectivity; Stereochemistry; Organic chemistry; Catalysis; Nucleophile","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001708735,0.0004796473,0.000516572,0.0005366415,0.000445882,0.001048295,0.0009455195,0.0005076557,0.001634148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001060626,0.0003210243,0.0002945277,0.0003656331,0.001891539,0.001486147,0.0009997088,0.001204048,0.000634878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004884108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004435462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001387545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000219585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990616,0.0003133496,0.00006814658,0.0002242527,0.0002237353,0.0001088176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994086,0.000236274,0.0001156955,0.0001389429,0.00005443668,0.00004601865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005631528,0.00009864576,0.0005587218,0.0003521856,0.00003499079,0.0004098575,0.0003479511,0.00162792,0.7170346,0.1898257,0.0007858386,0.08836052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001024348,0.001170707,0.0002637146,0.00002274061,0.00007198674,0.001322986,0.00007691128,0.006144573,0.9141321,0.02539397,0.05123443,0.00006338102],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2949857,0.005250178,0.6391792,0.00151649,0.000563891,0.0004478057,0.00020189,0.002428972,0.05542573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8466331,0.002868008,0.1382256,0.0009828671,0.000183127,0.0002929645,0.00009118152,0.0001670258,0.01055607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001708735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00903672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0159786515457426,"score_gpt":0.2033670115915619,"score_spread":0.1873883600458193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}