{"id":"W2008891695","doi":"10.1007/s12283-010-0058-8","title":"Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the golf swing using instantaneous screw axis theory, part 1: methodology and verification","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sports Engineering","topic":"Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Swing; Kinematics; Rotation (mathematics); Angular velocity; Screw axis; Screw theory; Mathematics; Motion analysis; Geometry; Geodesy; Motion (physics); Euler's rotation theorem; Rotation around a fixed axis; Circular motion; Physics; Computer science; Geology; Artificial intelligence; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005467964,0.0005979385,0.0005738849,0.001190396,0.0005003008,0.0008696097,0.0008030001,0.0003702198,0.003368845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00102519,0.0003201026,0.0006592696,0.0005830211,0.0006274481,0.0005074469,0.000678796,0.0003226044,0.0006517671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003678132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001068767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005260852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003402511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997897,0.00004059,0.00001395931,0.00003159622,0.0001082603,0.0000160413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997244,0.00008393174,0.00004996502,0.00003326161,0.00009909837,0.000009290648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102746,0.0001038407,0.004955331,0.000459585,0.00008259991,0.000376322,0.0004896719,0.6553963,0.03441178,0.1290645,0.001199459,0.1733578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000938785,0.00006319644,0.001672389,0.00002527177,0.00001577502,0.0001053996,0.00006184374,0.9851373,0.002574777,0.008497999,0.001822627,0.00001390278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02032548,0.0001009131,0.9767895,0.00002547947,0.00001417629,0.00003673903,0.00006354004,0.0001543535,0.002489647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8388996,0.0004865289,0.1560983,0.00002655725,0.00002839729,0.0002308927,0.0002102278,0.0001013414,0.00391818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005260852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01126993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03659775319500946,"score_gpt":0.213206137473373,"score_spread":0.1766083842783635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}