{"id":"W2008900004","doi":"10.1177/0539018407079726","title":"Non-rational compliance with social norms: sincere and hypocritical","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Compliance (psychology); Norm (philosophy); Proposition; Rational choice theory (criminology); Reputation; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Humanities; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics; Criminology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001021162,0.00008224593,0.0001018898,0.0000800128,0.003628059,0.0002968962,0.0001799785,0.00005969778,0.00002457407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005870292,0.0000788356,0.00002064176,0.0004268852,0.002880371,0.003244371,0.00006723146,0.00009345511,0.00004140494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004721794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002709597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005114558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006339629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987246,0.000009579053,0.000213091,0.0001206146,0.0005264908,0.0004056658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995041,0.00003735559,0.00009368111,0.00003491846,0.0002311542,0.00009873005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006854352,0.00005607144,0.02668486,0.0000145384,0.000006965599,0.000001260581,0.1770964,0.000001290305,0.0009921287,0.7522212,0.0004838051,0.04237293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001311225,0.000200362,0.7028794,0.0000333657,0.0000235685,0.000005709163,0.2606398,0.0002056107,0.002083704,0.007330904,0.02441006,0.0008762619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7134649,0.000006429619,0.0005372599,0.001598494,0.0001670665,0.0002312764,0.000008447961,0.00004709313,0.283939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986169,0.000003729534,0.000657426,0.0004288108,0.0002288565,0.000009687015,0.000005420848,0.000002496247,0.00004663679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7448903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04044375583079111,"score_gpt":0.3680077849358786,"score_spread":0.3275640291050875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}