{"id":"W2009045999","doi":"10.1109/acc.2010.5530715","title":"Nonlinear observer design for one-sided Lipschitz systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Maple Leaf Foods","funders":"","keywords":"Lipschitz continuity; Nonlinear system; Observer (physics); Mathematics; Extension (predicate logic); Class (philosophy); Control theory (sociology); Matrix (chemical analysis); State (computer science); Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Control (management); Mathematical analysis; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004263059,0.0001510638,0.0002611868,0.0000386333,0.00005451817,0.00008071092,0.0001904382,0.0001503734,0.00006169346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000140712,0.0001359097,0.00009864847,0.00007439251,0.00001978825,0.000119509,0.000009873474,0.0001597194,0.00007492543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002401591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002530445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008836688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001171768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990829,0.00002420136,0.0002992295,0.000174918,0.0001364042,0.0002823368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989904,0.0004414154,0.00002449393,0.0003602559,0.00008510358,0.00009830324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000468405,0.0004760377,0.002903944,0.002308347,0.0010792,0.00001073522,0.001222694,0.3100801,0.5927767,0.04883864,0.0263912,0.01344401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001319025,0.0001010757,0.0004232949,0.0000457357,0.0000377692,0.000006478077,0.0001673086,0.9505107,0.007765578,0.0003466206,0.03887176,0.0004047011],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.353291,0.000458859,0.6266705,0.0002253043,0.006055899,0.002672842,0.00004374892,0.001512708,0.009069105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788314,0.000002950068,0.0193281,0.0000378192,0.0006853831,0.0002451868,0.000007171987,0.00004091344,0.0008210533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6404306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5542235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03971267231536299,"score_gpt":0.227000726981777,"score_spread":0.187288054666414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}