{"id":"W2009059977","doi":"10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.03.031","title":"A comparative study of magnetic transferability of superparamagnetic nanoparticles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials","topic":"Iron oxide chemistry and applications","field":"Energy","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transferability; Superparamagnetism; Materials science; Nanoparticle; Magnetic nanoparticles; Condensed matter physics; Nanotechnology; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Computer science; Physics; Magnetic field; Magnetization; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002546027,0.0001823119,0.0001908103,0.000206222,0.0001770685,0.0002268471,0.0002933902,0.0003410534,0.001907273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005128217,0.0001238796,0.0001769176,0.0001989021,0.0001644942,0.0003908557,0.0001273342,0.0002921539,0.0002310009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000216086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009867377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006235823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005228838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998444,0.00002303217,0.000008345406,0.0000375695,0.00005177575,0.0000349035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997928,0.00008516276,0.00002629518,0.00002386362,0.0000528532,0.00001909672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001904781,0.00002260628,0.00005614329,0.00003336438,0.000005048084,0.00002478211,0.00002771893,0.00008917743,0.9980926,0.00009760489,0.00003139769,0.001329032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008947291,0.0002555789,0.0008027788,0.000001504082,0.00001178387,0.00004219025,0.00001641662,0.0008706772,0.9974067,0.00002767767,0.0005533041,0.000002522621],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954681,0.0006161608,0.001559486,0.00004187487,0.0000183287,0.00001590877,0.00007772938,0.00003470605,0.002167681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975448,0.0001876986,0.0005517817,0.00001393735,0.000009351044,0.00001279212,0.0001163939,0.0000148083,0.001548269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001907273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006380439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01392685307774455,"score_gpt":0.2531313499102546,"score_spread":0.23920449683251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}