{"id":"W2009059977","doi":"10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.03.031","title":"A comparative study of magnetic transferability of superparamagnetic nanoparticles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials","topic":"Iron oxide chemistry and applications","field":"Energy","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transferability; Superparamagnetism; Materials science; Nanoparticle; Magnetic nanoparticles; Condensed matter physics; Nanotechnology; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Computer science; Physics; Magnetic field; Magnetization; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005971622,0.0002278092,0.0008469888,0.0001027562,0.00005737293,0.00003541278,0.0003198868,0.0001184026,0.004351417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007778912,0.000192373,0.00007983999,0.0001648852,0.000403441,0.0001143443,0.00005618269,0.000191294,0.000004108772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005386943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005598489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003085247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001651732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997696,0.0001889656,0.001345418,0.00021823,0.0003208409,0.0002305127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985536,0.000207083,0.0004170699,0.0003891371,0.0002780147,0.0001551377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002685965,0.001079803,0.0004204991,0.0001795563,0.00001958055,0.000007004312,0.002326977,0.00001531727,0.9904253,0.001428096,0.00004968964,0.003779561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002897894,0.005293974,0.06631166,0.00004336914,0.0002715707,0.0001410545,0.002135029,0.00001159948,0.9194877,0.002283842,0.0008979957,0.0002243039],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975185,0.0005946622,0.000004593363,0.0001223704,0.0002198618,0.0003761547,0.00003766696,0.00001006248,0.001116115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986264,0.000094868,0.0009326825,0.00001261035,0.00008828668,0.00002191415,0.000002451478,0.00001498142,0.0002057959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07093761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01392685307774455,"score_gpt":0.2531313499102546,"score_spread":0.23920449683251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}