{"id":"W2009142018","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4581.2008.00114.x","title":"RAPID DETECTION OF <i>FRANCISELLA TULARENSIS</i> BY THE IMMUNOAFFINITY ASSAY ABICAP IN ENVIRONMENTAL AND HUMAN SAMPLES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Rapid Methods & Automation in Microbiology","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Biological Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Francisella tularensis; Tularemia; Outbreak; Biology; Microbiology; Detection limit; Virology; Veterinary medicine; Chromatography; Medicine; Chemistry; Virulence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007258989,0.0004827471,0.0004133646,0.0006450982,0.0003382934,0.0005953543,0.0003929038,0.0007503497,0.0009657854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009053961,0.0002477043,0.0001879199,0.0003574878,0.0003467242,0.000193745,0.0005033325,0.0006366831,0.001134114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001702205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000355622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001212379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00103745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998844,0.0004140411,0.00005283967,0.00022428,0.0003217371,0.0001430104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999683,0.00009628775,0.00004156245,0.00002512434,0.000108555,0.0000454597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003141148,0.0001687571,0.006312538,0.0003620597,0.00004252947,0.0002372343,0.0001549047,0.000237978,0.9677684,0.0001687385,0.001094121,0.02313848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003769928,0.001096582,0.02949538,0.0001365287,0.00009883256,0.002383938,0.0001577029,0.006985111,0.9476569,0.0002182852,0.01166915,0.000063845],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8162665,0.008363277,0.1585069,0.0007643272,0.0002985384,0.0006984853,0.003385806,0.002333721,0.009382365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192491,0.001997478,0.06935984,0.0008848078,0.0001055655,0.0005495378,0.003057907,0.00005698418,0.004738905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001212379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003838956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01817712887917188,"score_gpt":0.2908490471845606,"score_spread":0.2726719183053887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}