{"id":"W2009142598","doi":"10.1142/s0218127404009491","title":"COMPLEXITY OF EYE MOVEMENTS IN READING","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos","topic":"Machine Learning in Bioinformatics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Eye movement; Fixation (population genetics); Computer science; Reading (process); Coding (social sciences); Nonlinear system; Artificial intelligence; Dynamical systems theory; Algorithm; Speech recognition; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001622539,0.00004016861,0.00006326286,0.00009101925,0.000008807087,0.000008822053,0.000117425,0.00003078948,0.000009131737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007528208,0.0000369749,0.00002661219,0.00002884286,0.0000411797,0.000008042498,0.00003253591,0.00005868942,7.756517e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001982624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003256595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001830756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001054823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994864,0.00001182438,0.0002731038,0.00003947387,0.0001479167,0.0000412861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999518,0.000003589555,0.0002515217,0.00004405672,0.000160773,0.00002199465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006087731,0.0006313286,0.3788829,0.00009595104,0.0003828784,0.00001518339,0.004297673,0.008747876,0.559981,0.01931982,0.0003063705,0.02673015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008105464,0.0009109673,0.6539263,0.0004631183,0.0000167818,0.000215427,0.00145617,0.002235263,0.3071366,0.0108597,0.01431317,0.0003610328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938029,0.0000575056,0.004390678,0.000687846,0.0001437949,0.00002953831,0.000003624328,9.220777e-7,0.000883196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973171,0.0001138172,0.002229546,0.0001935311,0.00007818651,4.6405e-7,0.00001438206,0.000002869637,0.00005008706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1507793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01345951437830744,"score_gpt":0.3045324303147959,"score_spread":0.2910729159364885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}