{"id":"W2009185709","doi":"10.1016/j.physleta.2010.07.010","title":"A competitive game whose maximal Nash-equilibrium payoff requires quantum resources for its achievement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics Letters A","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"Australian Research Council; Government of Canada; Industry Canada; Australian Government; University of Oregon","keywords":"Physics; Nash equilibrium; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Quantum; Quantum mechanics; Statistical physics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001452249,0.000265505,0.0002682543,0.00003602952,0.0001803475,0.0001332189,0.0003507456,0.00003785651,0.00007125728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000527245,0.0002579328,0.0002228253,0.0001459144,0.00007590731,0.000183468,0.0001192456,0.0002986859,0.00008854816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001482295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000313893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003933461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003943778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985744,0.00002532074,0.0002791472,0.0004452937,0.0002109543,0.0004648704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990503,0.0001135275,0.0001910235,0.0004258151,0.00009534304,0.0001239975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001822116,0.0001757798,0.0001019504,0.00001231837,0.00004963307,3.991435e-7,0.0002629059,0.000008482388,0.3805612,0.6163862,0.001326666,0.001096221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002964397,0.0003255114,0.001198502,0.0001068458,0.0002182336,0.00000184865,0.0007703684,0.03310125,0.1745317,0.4058378,0.3793089,0.001634594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318858,0.00001248797,0.05916998,0.006693636,0.00031236,0.0007199222,0.0003870004,0.0000712652,0.0007474938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957603,6.74974e-7,0.001003909,0.0009148109,0.001589269,0.000462967,0.0001278362,0.00005440239,0.0000858547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3779822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0147520694877498,"score_gpt":0.2530557611770038,"score_spread":0.238303691689254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}