{"id":"W2009204692","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2015.02.007","title":"Assessing the use of slicing-based visualizing techniques on the understanding of large metamodels","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information and Software Technology","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Metamodeling; Computer science; Slicing; Program slicing; Visualization; Correctness; Program comprehension; Human–computer interaction; Software engineering; Domain (mathematical analysis); Modeling language; Usability; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Software; Software system; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01458886,0.001350558,0.000553237,0.004524133,0.0005724626,0.002997266,0.00124476,0.001749067,0.001162344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1458138,0.0005845504,0.0009638742,0.002249899,0.0006325736,0.005538179,0.002027193,0.001410872,0.0002546607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008730282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001643291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004948425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006600722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914966,0.004716784,0.0007396531,0.0006904221,0.002040811,0.0003158231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7502254,0.206965,0.01173577,0.01454052,0.0147163,0.001816929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003823297,0.002027193,0.1607757,0.002008743,0.001320866,0.0005741039,0.02535035,0.09329972,0.07871675,0.00608891,0.002369676,0.6236448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003450565,0.004635177,0.1546956,0.0007835236,0.001769263,0.000841694,0.009261508,0.7248854,0.08525414,0.009867526,0.007267626,0.0003935279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359182,0.0003787357,0.05848887,0.0002126112,0.00001816001,0.0001821632,0.0003228752,0.001746953,0.002731297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082794,0.0002502309,0.09027129,0.00003151737,0.000007719247,0.00007499041,0.0004946065,0.0002488157,0.000341359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01458886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07715422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1477720149986331,"score_gpt":0.3510519464246652,"score_spread":0.2032799314260321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}