{"id":"W2009272203","doi":"10.1016/j.rcim.2010.08.004","title":"The self-adaptation of weights for joint-limits and singularity avoidances of functionally redundant robotic-task","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Kinematics; Task (project management); Adaptation (eye); Singularity; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Systems engineering; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004121499,0.0003577764,0.0002768032,0.0002042454,0.000200583,0.000338441,0.0004832381,0.0003248119,0.0008234061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001955795,0.0002403752,0.0002178088,0.0001504879,0.0003779226,0.0005011926,0.0006657623,0.0003633385,0.0001358821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001642883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001998648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006436466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007155113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999033,0.00002632825,0.000007671485,0.000017677,0.00003019306,0.00001483601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.000111143,0.00005126156,0.00004279385,0.00007631019,0.00002440532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001550158,0.0001152256,0.000974637,0.0001091374,0.00006246222,0.0001020078,0.0002726981,0.7446484,0.0547854,0.0385827,0.0007427634,0.1594495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005230216,0.00005019563,0.0004094544,0.000004447729,0.000006822372,0.0000272699,0.00001531888,0.9888998,0.001850862,0.008486755,0.0002368458,0.000006955983],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2009405,0.0001488665,0.7953053,0.00007325038,0.00002912527,0.00002491831,0.00001162637,0.000116824,0.003349619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725789,0.00005803386,0.02598476,0.00001685684,0.000008531885,0.00002814428,0.00001184109,0.00003055263,0.001282306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008234061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002754569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009318882674625563,"score_gpt":0.1877619056554315,"score_spread":0.1784430229808059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}