{"id":"W2009304951","doi":"10.5539/ies.v5n2p118","title":"Group Dynamics and Peer-Tutoring a Pedagogical Tool for Learning in Higher Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus","keywords":"Teamwork; Cooperative learning; Higher education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Diversity (politics); Value (mathematics); Institution; Process (computing); Active learning (machine learning); Empirical research; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Teaching method; Computer science; Sociology; Management; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001481692,0.000114712,0.000140264,0.0002220036,0.0001297224,0.00003322313,0.00008280836,0.00006272922,0.0001747868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001423899,0.0001103287,0.00003156908,0.0001259586,0.00005018971,0.0001774627,0.00004139788,0.0002804298,0.00001840191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002735489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005824675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006756996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000498497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989733,0.0002250575,0.0002470912,0.0002065343,0.0001562886,0.0001917061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986532,0.0004681807,0.0001300817,0.00007782986,0.0006416954,0.00002906002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003947345,0.000387202,0.4240518,0.00001763843,0.00008850157,7.800718e-8,0.01596658,0.000004150895,0.00004928557,0.4063685,0.002507598,0.1505192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002574731,0.00003844797,0.6517957,0.00004599506,0.00001330771,0.000007876698,0.01407369,0.00003085296,0.000003041476,0.002621221,0.3309731,0.0001392513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.952192,0.002095305,0.00375122,0.005637889,0.01738808,0.0001862283,0.000002449711,0.0000643357,0.01868246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8519716,0.00001470365,0.008249041,0.000361443,0.001338907,0.0003441981,0.00005567643,0.00001481126,0.1376497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4037472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4499073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.295003674477741,"score_gpt":0.5523440979206549,"score_spread":0.2573404234429139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}