{"id":"W2009313397","doi":"10.1139/l03-101","title":"Using genetic algorithms in solving the one-dimensional cutting stock problem in the construction industry","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Optimization and Packing Problems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Construction waste; Stock (firearms); Integer programming; Cutting stock problem; Genetic algorithm; Profit (economics); Engineering; Linear programming; Mathematical optimization; Optimization problem; Computer science; Operations research; Waste management; Mathematics; Economics; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000680095,0.0006258559,0.0004633494,0.0006608684,0.000367335,0.000790273,0.0005742827,0.001095,0.0007272928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001596902,0.0003307513,0.0004447539,0.0009019155,0.0007753285,0.0004809959,0.0003170944,0.0004988891,0.00009788803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007659011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001289147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01447357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01206492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996909,0.0001742074,0.00001288679,0.00003476155,0.00005711612,0.00003022591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994662,0.0004287428,0.00004227415,0.00001365562,0.00003887928,0.00001026883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001207136,0.00001886035,0.0004089018,0.00002420403,0.00001821098,0.00004079979,0.00002430502,0.9847921,0.000349048,0.002305933,0.0001140694,0.01189158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001834728,0.00004594042,0.0002032813,0.0000128488,0.00001610811,0.00003300385,0.00004186622,0.9943177,0.0005163861,0.004258595,0.0005292202,0.000006658374],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2363122,0.001560224,0.7528563,0.0005641286,0.00004617605,0.0001348264,0.00006481619,0.0002725256,0.008188993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6932626,0.001454378,0.3025371,0.0001362109,0.00002044782,0.0001986009,0.0001356238,0.00003365666,0.002221475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01447357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02877861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02005764888547754,"score_gpt":0.2078137493595844,"score_spread":0.1877561004741069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}