{"id":"W2009313397","doi":"10.1139/l03-101","title":"Using genetic algorithms in solving the one-dimensional cutting stock problem in the construction industry","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Optimization and Packing Problems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Construction waste; Stock (firearms); Integer programming; Cutting stock problem; Genetic algorithm; Profit (economics); Engineering; Linear programming; Mathematical optimization; Optimization problem; Computer science; Operations research; Waste management; Mathematics; Economics; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000444245,0.0001285132,0.0001467963,0.0003943647,0.00007615684,0.00008537278,0.0001956275,0.0001249795,0.00002721707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004909498,0.0001056999,0.00004162593,0.0005014155,0.00002863886,0.0001658991,0.000006410765,0.000917312,7.652869e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003471284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003289137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008343588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01708474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990135,0.00002544327,0.0004035119,0.00007368487,0.0001619455,0.0003218759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996083,0.00004872186,0.00006874029,0.00009991173,0.0000480193,0.0001262997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[4.84386e-7,0.000002698851,0.00198855,0.00002231889,0.00001206354,0.00004530505,0.001062675,0.9959828,0.0001909867,0.0001428651,0.00001270004,0.0005365168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009300205,0.00003133912,0.01160826,0.001324221,0.00002562937,0.001461302,0.0005544994,0.9824116,0.0001970341,0.0005357394,0.0005820093,0.0003383945],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8506027,0.002938071,0.1416073,0.0009498093,0.001742979,0.0005223138,0.000007446267,0.0000618921,0.001567407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759951,0.00001167151,0.02376572,0.00004915573,0.0001455008,0.000002726095,6.268129e-7,0.0000277271,0.000001723184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9533686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02005764888547754,"score_gpt":0.2078137493595844,"score_spread":0.1877561004741069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}