{"id":"W2009422318","doi":"10.1139/t02-001","title":"Liquefied strength ratio from liquefaction flow failure case histories","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":262,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation","keywords":"Liquefaction; Geotechnical engineering; Penetration test; Penetration (warfare); Soil liquefaction; Shear strength (soil); Flow resistance; Flow (mathematics); Materials science; Geology; Engineering; Mechanics; Soil water; Soil science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006492359,0.0005153961,0.0002809504,0.00430124,0.0003031442,0.0003411365,0.0005808098,0.0002596029,0.00346062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004612354,0.0001965626,0.0003216373,0.0009537716,0.0004015809,0.0003890724,0.0004084473,0.0002530596,0.0005332741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007037702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003728411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01339461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02512859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995926,0.00003174177,0.00003883816,0.00006833042,0.000229302,0.00003925758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981977,0.00064172,0.0003002899,0.0001551968,0.0006284782,0.00007648324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001089913,0.0002635083,0.586737,0.0005623011,0.0001811727,0.003102399,0.001817671,0.0831264,0.103767,0.001200275,0.002399843,0.2157525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000370579,0.000969237,0.7958465,0.00007876486,0.000151136,0.003380054,0.0005089806,0.07792813,0.1153811,0.0008716725,0.004705018,0.0001423227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871641,0.0001163296,0.007705841,0.00001292126,0.000002487113,0.0000783111,0.001995015,0.0002163893,0.002708456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924297,0.00008674179,0.00416454,0.00000277601,0.000001472408,0.00003982293,0.002351829,0.0000241855,0.0008989677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01339461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02663332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008888206126364024,"score_gpt":0.1723916748537693,"score_spread":0.1635034687274053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}