{"id":"W2009591468","doi":"10.1139/f10-044","title":"Designing marine reserves to reduce bycatch of mobile species: a case study using juvenile red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service","keywords":"Bycatch; Fishery; Juvenile; Abundance (ecology); Marine reserve; Shrimp; Fishing; Environmental science; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005951815,0.0003035774,0.0001830242,0.0004669698,0.001046324,0.000454697,0.0005592649,0.0004540248,0.0007752772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001074178,0.000117031,0.000335699,0.0003262127,0.0003783743,0.0005139834,0.0005707832,0.0002411433,0.00006682878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006984916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000690103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01646658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07814206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998067,0.000086869,0.000007878717,0.000030077,0.00002878893,0.00003969483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999347,0.0003088526,0.0001336307,0.00004724823,0.00007939892,0.00008382471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007174028,0.002692402,0.7183241,0.000775003,0.0004021001,0.02157441,0.009919276,0.03313325,0.03776945,0.002845709,0.002813271,0.1690337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001782242,0.006968154,0.8577077,0.0003047349,0.000573878,0.005024596,0.0394498,0.05714257,0.01709559,0.00215674,0.01325482,0.0001431592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986175,0.00005766852,0.0005523113,0.00005796654,0.000002272202,0.00003617973,0.00002420658,0.000007383985,0.000644521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993952,0.0001322457,0.00514933,0.00003371131,0.000002026082,0.00004672761,0.00003636881,0.000003644941,0.0006440264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03274149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04448696354123838,"score_gpt":0.2794084072504814,"score_spread":0.234921443709243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}