{"id":"W2009699389","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.018","title":"The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pain and Symptom Management","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":424,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary; St. Boniface Hospital; CancerCare Manitoba; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Palliative care; Distress; Cronbach's alpha; Concurrent validity; Quality of life (healthcare); Medicine; Reliability (semiconductor); Clinical psychology; Psychology; Nursing; Psychometrics; Internal consistency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008288277,0.0001322042,0.000313387,0.0001630406,0.0001476788,0.0000134089,0.0001294639,0.00004792715,0.000006116426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002211658,0.00008748473,0.0001210673,0.0001971318,0.0001168313,0.00008457891,0.00009541176,0.000271437,7.89367e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001367164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003267299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002377568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001733695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983926,0.0002100299,0.000606742,0.0001149781,0.0004877326,0.0001879445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989439,0.0001810457,0.0004170505,0.0001669866,0.0001754664,0.0001155606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008319919,0.001284931,0.8984343,0.0009911577,0.0009185862,0.0004664956,0.04075404,0.0001476551,0.0003372697,0.001065134,0.0005848599,0.05418361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006234371,0.001615267,0.966263,0.002166976,0.0002235242,0.00002777897,0.01519205,0.0004989973,0.0005088559,0.0005830086,0.006445571,0.0002406152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947866,0.001435864,0.0002975618,0.0002964649,0.000117247,0.0003441702,0.000005504817,0.000005952377,0.002710619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987168,0.0009226715,0.000139231,0.0001036057,0.00002260145,0.000005390564,0.000004614186,0.000008557938,0.00007649497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06782871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3567524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04899321421557767,"score_gpt":0.2645550788016898,"score_spread":0.2155618645861122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}