{"id":"W2009768131","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2013.805660","title":"Macrofungal diversity and habitat specificity: a case study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Economic geography; Biology; Sociology; Environmental science; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004664159,0.0004217592,0.0002790997,0.001810126,0.001202479,0.0009588151,0.0005977907,0.0006524828,0.001797702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001645533,0.000237474,0.0003151817,0.00230896,0.0007906273,0.0005132713,0.001076264,0.000397296,0.0002114873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001013943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003219331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02325369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04291463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994376,0.0001883427,0.0000367904,0.00007661557,0.0000993733,0.0001611851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991714,0.0003096665,0.0002302733,0.00007564282,0.00007221304,0.0001408715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001308605,0.0002609632,0.8475832,0.0001839514,0.00005731971,0.1150596,0.01214873,0.000336968,0.001291122,0.0006185825,0.00047922,0.02184948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001274757,0.0004240862,0.8102532,0.0001131587,0.00008278475,0.1576447,0.02447037,0.001267635,0.0009081299,0.0003567838,0.004423264,0.00004312794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978744,0.0004447226,0.0001949605,0.00008393396,0.000002595474,0.00002039066,0.00009849308,0.00000379668,0.001276731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985214,0.0006743812,0.0002548223,0.00002429632,0.000009607663,0.000006644259,0.00005332246,0.000003058366,0.0004524676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02325369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04623663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02774512282933192,"score_gpt":0.1940756372877968,"score_spread":0.1663305144584649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}