{"id":"W2009769261","doi":"10.1037/a0030510","title":"On the electrophysiological evidence for the capture of visual attention.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"N2pc; Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Selective attention; Visual search; Event-related potential; Salient; Cognitive psychology; Visual attention; Electroencephalography; Neuroscience; Perception; Computer science; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005225674,0.0003043903,0.0001575399,0.0008128157,0.0001572438,0.0003645779,0.0003296574,0.0004393231,0.004189668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001639551,0.0001093268,0.0001724906,0.0003310257,0.0009215833,0.0004915583,0.0004553357,0.0005483648,0.001074898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001778791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001371506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003996605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004570627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998032,0.00002874159,0.00001872714,0.00005070168,0.00008076092,0.00001784783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998969,0.0005359242,0.0001593059,0.0001116624,0.000161565,0.00006257345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003909205,0.0001119585,0.005220551,0.0004744561,0.00007250302,0.002008186,0.0001185178,0.0001406195,0.9338892,0.002996991,0.0005543585,0.05402186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007794443,0.001327741,0.7441676,0.0002339188,0.0002105682,0.01509954,0.0004332755,0.002055371,0.2126423,0.009973737,0.01371507,0.00006292047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8683544,0.01749027,0.0541376,0.001527346,0.0006387562,0.0002498601,0.0009555213,0.0002279967,0.05641829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826872,0.006310814,0.006859456,0.0009545257,0.0002405266,0.00008413644,0.0004046215,0.00001713264,0.002441606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004189668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01401585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2897011917469891,"score_gpt":0.4856636858698899,"score_spread":0.1959624941229008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}