{"id":"W2009832294","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2014.881058","title":"A GIS-supported fuzzy-set approach for flood risk assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Government of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flood myth; Geographic information system; Flood risk assessment; Digital elevation model; Fuzzy logic; Risk assessment; Fuzzy set; Risk analysis (engineering); 100-year flood; Computer science; Environmental science; Data mining; Hydrology (agriculture); Water resource management; Civil engineering; Geography; Geology; Engineering; Remote sensing; Geotechnical engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002376704,0.0006084646,0.0006417506,0.0005500955,0.001897462,0.0007202985,0.001256839,0.0002386219,0.0006816093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001472099,0.0004841057,0.0003613732,0.0003430989,0.0005175763,0.0005641585,0.0001782805,0.000709011,0.0000579718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001751454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001116768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2114669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5944989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951937,0.0004890416,0.0008235829,0.000902077,0.0003477458,0.002243829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962958,0.00009227511,0.0004019986,0.0007311144,0.0001010328,0.002377794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003031242,0.0004838564,0.2742149,0.0007356556,0.00152348,0.0007610337,0.5259405,0.07451229,0.003096714,0.0001279137,0.009461873,0.1088387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009797256,0.0005253063,0.01028799,0.00007135596,0.0002297957,0.0002763415,0.0009861343,0.0188721,0.0004660554,0.003083831,0.9633961,0.000825263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.96816,0.0001275813,0.00492147,0.0006945811,0.0002884349,0.0008480439,0.0001181872,0.00009240773,0.02474929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823813,0.0002280204,0.0125828,0.0006213436,0.0006654412,0.0001665752,0.0001836929,0.0001275174,0.003043263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01167118026621663,"score_gpt":0.2136225703778037,"score_spread":0.2019513901115871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}