{"id":"W2009977435","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.006","title":"Threats to Canadian species at risk: An analysis of finalized recovery strategies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Endangered species; Habitat; Wildlife; Critical habitat; Recreation; Critically endangered; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental planning; Biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003594984,0.0006599837,0.0003590363,0.00442382,0.005886072,0.002649282,0.002813815,0.001086671,0.004213789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01084634,0.0002534665,0.00111779,0.003521656,0.001795879,0.001122585,0.001944559,0.001166553,0.0001777116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05501775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07127412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9561004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954922,0.0004061448,0.00009774858,0.0002271719,0.001862683,0.001914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992873,0.0006719661,0.0008519036,0.0001914435,0.004237768,0.001173949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001290245,0.0006698869,0.5966915,0.000551372,0.0008572634,0.001180786,0.00832548,0.03805896,0.002643614,0.0498803,0.01711325,0.2827373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004408454,0.0004319132,0.9467452,0.000193698,0.0004954471,0.0002548119,0.01473195,0.01324381,0.0007283302,0.003614694,0.01941078,0.0001052773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192183,0.001552964,0.00126489,0.002811145,0.00003668496,0.0007239504,0.001241626,0.00004524341,0.07310507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879731,0.001081424,0.002422838,0.0003725627,0.000008697001,0.0001092176,0.0005713147,0.00001302184,0.007447725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05501775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3991836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04445685709558191,"score_gpt":0.2450077701289853,"score_spread":0.2005509130334034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}